The July 13 selloff was driven by Korea’s tightening credit chain and structural pressure around SK Hynix, not by clear evidence that AI memory demand had collapsed. SK Hynix’s Korea-listed shares fell a record 15.4%, Samsung Electronics dropped nearly 11%, and KOSPI closed down 8.9%. In China, storage-chip names sold off, but Muxi rose countertrend and bank shares gained on a record 2025 dividend backdrop, showing investors were reallocating rather than selling everything indiscriminately.
| Primary source | Wallstreetcn |
|---|---|
| Reported at | 2026-07-13T17:57:54.000Z |
| Topic | 债券 |
| Evidence limit | Reported facts are separated from interpretation; current prices and platform terms require independent verification. |
Evaluate BINANCE for your use case
Check regional eligibility, current fees and product availability on the official destination.
Review BINANCEWhat Happened On July 13
The event began with stress in Korea’s banking and equity-market structure. The supplied brief says Korea’s five major commercial banks had already used more than 85% of their annual household-loan growth quota in the first half of the year, leaving little new-credit space for the second half.
That pressure met an equity-market catalyst around SK Hynix. Its Korea-listed shares fell 15.4% in one day, erasing more than 89 billion dollars in market value, while Samsung Electronics fell nearly 11%. KOSPI closed down 8.9%, and the shock spread into broader Asia-Pacific technology trading.
The A-share reaction was selective. The STAR 50 pulled back from high levels, and several storage-chip names hit limit-down or double-digit losses. At the same time, Muxi rose more than 13% intraday and reached a historical high, while the banking sector strengthened.
Why The SK Hynix Drop Matters
The decision-useful point is that the supplied brief separates market structure from end demand. Photon Capital attributed the SK Hynix fall to three supply-side or trading factors: profit-taking after the ADR’s first-day US rally, new share supply from a 26.5 billion dollar US IPO, and repricing between Korea shares and the US ADR.
That distinction matters because the brief does not present the selloff as proof that AI memory demand has failed. It cites Photon Capital’s view that structural AI memory demand still exceeds supply and that broader trends in memory pricing, demand growth, and tight supply did not disappear overnight.
The brief also cites Korea Investment & Securities, which expected SK Hynix Q2 operating profit to be 8% below market expectations because a higher HBM revenue share limited average selling price gains versus peers. That is an earnings-expectation adjustment, not the same thing as a demand collapse.
Why A-Shares Did Not Move As One Trade
A-share technology names showed a split market rather than a blanket exit from AI. Storage-chip pressure was severe, with the brief naming Shannon Semiconductor, GigaDevice, Demingli, Biwin Storage, and related AI hardware supply-chain names as examples of sharp declines or profit-taking.
On the other side, Muxi rose more than 13% intraday, touched 1,033 yuan, closed nearly 7% higher, and exceeded 400 billion yuan in market value. The supplied explanation gives two drivers: its upcoming Xijing S-series supernode product debut at WAIC 2026 and expectations for domestic GPU replacement demand under overseas high-end chip supply limits.
The brief cites Donghai Securities data that domestic AI accelerator-card share rose from 30% in 2024 to 41% in 2025, and that the domestic AI accelerator-chip market is expected to grow 59% year over year to 381.4 billion yuan in 2026. These figures support the argument that investors were distinguishing domestic compute logic from imported storage-chain pressure.
The Bank Dividend Signal
Capital did not simply leave the market in the supplied account. It rotated toward defensive yield. Suzhou Bank rose 6.15%, China Construction Bank rose 3.56%, and Bank of Communications and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China also strengthened.
The brief cites Wind data showing 41 banks with more than 645.6 billion yuan in total 2025 annual dividends, a record high, with recent final dividends near 345.9 billion yuan. It also says the dividend low-volatility index had a 5.2% trailing 12-month dividend yield, while its latest weekly turnover share of all A-shares was only 1.23%.
That combination describes a safety-margin trade: investors were not rejecting risk assets uniformly, but comparing earnings delivery, dividend visibility, valuation pressure, and trading crowding across sectors.
What Crypto And Binance Readers Can Use From This
This is relevant to Binance news readers as a cross-market risk-sentiment signal, not as a direct claim about any crypto asset. The supplied event does not provide Binance trading data, token-flow data, or exchange-specific impact evidence.
The practical reading is simple: when equity stress comes from credit tightening and forced repositioning, crypto traders should separate liquidity shocks from fundamental demand signals. A fast selloff in Asia technology can influence risk appetite, but the brief does not prove a direct causal effect on crypto prices.
Readers using Binance or any exchange can treat this as a checklist moment: monitor broad market volatility, avoid assuming every AI-linked decline means demand collapse, compare spot and derivative exposure carefully, and keep position sizing aligned with personal risk limits. This article is market analysis, not financial advice.
Evidence Limits And Risks
The analysis here uses only the supplied event brief. It does not independently verify Korea bank lending data, stock prices, fund-flow data, analyst notes, or company statements beyond what the brief contains.
The key risk is that market structure and fundamentals can converge later. A selloff that begins with credit stress, ETF pressure, or ADR repricing can still damage confidence, funding conditions, or earnings multiples if it persists.
Another limit is timing. The supplied brief describes conditions around July 13 and related near-term commentary. Any later market recovery, further decline, regulatory action, or company update is outside this source material.
Evaluate BINANCE for your use case
Check regional eligibility, current fees and product availability on the official destination.
Review BINANCEAffiliate link · Availability varies by region · No guaranteed outcomeQuestions readers ask
Was the SK Hynix crash caused by weaker AI memory demand?
The supplied brief does not support that conclusion. It attributes the record drop mainly to profit-taking, new share supply, and Korea-share versus ADR repricing, while also citing views that structural AI memory demand still exceeds supply.
Why did Chinese storage-chip stocks fall while Muxi rose?
The brief describes a selective repricing. Storage-chip names were hit by Korea-linked AI hardware pressure and profit-taking, while Muxi benefited from domestic GPU expectations, its planned WAIC 2026 product debut, and demand for local AI acceleration under overseas high-end chip supply limits.
Why did Chinese bank shares rise during a technology selloff?
The supplied data points to defensive rotation. Banks were supported by a record 645.6 billion yuan 2025 annual dividend backdrop, recent final dividend payments, and lower trading crowding than the technology sector.
Does this event directly affect Binance or crypto prices?
The brief does not provide direct evidence of Binance-specific or crypto-asset price impact. For Binance news readers, the event is best treated as a macro risk-sentiment signal from Asian equities and credit conditions.
What should readers check before acting on this market story?
Readers should distinguish liquidity pressure from demand deterioration, compare sector-level moves with company-specific catalysts, check whether later data confirms or contradicts the July 13 brief, and avoid making leveraged decisions from a single event summary.